Inefficient alternative energy less attractive in US now

Fuel Fix:
The Trump administration’s plans to dismantle the Clean Power Plan and its waffling on the Paris climate accords could push renewable energy investors away from the United States, according to a report released this week from the London-based accounting firm Ernst and Young.

Every year, the firm ranks countries on its Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index, which examines a country’s need for renewable energy, government incentives, natural resources and government policy to determine its potential for renewable energy growth. Last year, the U.S. topped the firm’s list of potential renewable energy growth following the extension of the wind production tax credit.

But this year’s index shows that the U.S. has fallen behind China and India, as investors worry that the Trump administration will abolish federal clean energy incentives and tax credits, according to the report.

RELATED: Developing world overtakes West in renewables investments

The report also acknowledged that President Donald Trump has yet to follow through on many of his campaign promises to boost the fossil fuel energy. For instance, Trump has not said whether he intends to pull the United States out of the Paris climate accords, an agreement by nearly 200 countries to dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions. While Trump has ordered the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to review the Clean Power Plan, which aims to reduce carbon emissions from power plants, the new EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has said he will not challenge a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that carbon dioxide is a pollutant that must be regulated.
...
Alternative energy is at best a niche product that makes sense in a limited number of applications.  But it is too inefficient to compete with natural gas.  The alternative energy applications cost more and thus the need for subsidies to spur investment.  Its biggest weaknesses are concern its intermittent generation of power and its lack of an ability to modulate its flow of energy.  Its most obvious benefits are in off the grid situations and some military applications that reduce the need for fuel convoys.

Solar energy is very labor intensive and needs more people to produce a fraction of the energy provided by a natural gas plant.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iraq says civilian casualties in Mosul caused by ISIS booby trap, not US air strike

Liberal fascists strike against Trump supporters in Berkeley

OPEC reduces production again in price maintenance program