Obama's desperate bluster

Rich Lowry:

President Obama likes to present himself as the only adult left in Washington, but last night's televised address to the nation had more than a whiff of childish desperation about it.

It's clear: The only thing that matters to him right now is not the fate of the country but his re-election.

Discussing the looming Aug. 2 deadline to raise the debt ceiling -- the subject of fierce debate and negotiation for the past few weeks -- the president last night once again (a) blamed Bush, (b) demonized the successful, (c) denounced "tax breaks" for corporate jets and oil companies, (d) threatened the country's seniors, veterans and contractors with the chimera of "default" and (e) dredged up the ghost of Ronald Reagan to try and cast himself as the great compromiser.

In short, he was hoping the country mistakes bluster for a negotiating position. For demanding a "balanced" approach to solving the crisis (read: massive tax increases) is so yesterday. Events have already passed Obama by.

House Speaker John Boehner, who followed the president with a calm, confident -- and firm -- speech of his own, noted that the House has already passed its "Cut, Cap and Balance" proposal (unceremoniously rejected by the Senate) and told the country he'd soon be sending over a new proposal.

Boehner's plan would delay the current crisis by authorizing an immediate $1 trillion increase in the debt ceiling in exchange for $1.2 trillion in real federal spending cuts over the next decade. A subsequent step would allow another $1.6 trillion in borrowing in exchange for cuts of at least $1.8 trillion in 2012.

Even Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has blown by Obama with a plan to bump up the ceiling just once, by $2.5 trillion, with (allegedly) $2.7 trillion in spending cuts. But it includes a $1 trillion "savings" in ending the wars in Iraq in Afghanistan -- something that will happen (or not) no matter what Congress does.

...
Obama is desperate to stay relevant as events unfold. It is not working. His best chance would be to take the deal Boehner offered him originally or at least try to split the difference on revenues.

BTW, revenues could be significantly increased if the Obama administration would open up federal controlled properties to oil and gas drilling. The royalties alone would be worth over a trillion dollars, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of jobs that would be created.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more